Game the Game, Roll vs Role, The Gazebo

One of the classic folk-tales of gaming involves a gazebo:

Screenshot 2017-12-11 09.43.08.png

Instead of clarifying, the GM just let it go.


The GM’s job is to immerse the players in the game world, because the characters live there and are likely highly competent. If the players don’t know what a gazebo is, tell them.

Additionally, if you’re playing in a sci-fi world and nanites are a thing, and the PCs are investigating something, you might want to remind them of nanites. Don’t punish them because they did not expressly state they were looking for nanites.


Game the Game: Roll vs Role: Expectations

A GM wants to start a campaign.

They want to do their take on a Star Wars game, where the PCs are the heroes.

They change enough stuff, but the core remains, the force, and an evil empire.

Trouble is, as soon as the twist shows up, the player characters decide they just want to roam the stars. Like Firefly.


The cmapign stalls, the GM clearly wanted the PCs to be the heroes.

They wanted to be the rogues.

So, perhaps the more appropriate pic would be:


Pregenerated characters can help this situation, but once in the hands of players, a GM cannot do anything but react.

The bigger picture is being clear with what is expected, and what is desired:

“I want to run a Star Wars game where over time we will explore many of the same themes of the original 3 films, and truly it will be an epic story of good versus evil. Do you want to play?”

If players agree, and then flake, the GM can talk to them, or end the campaign, but will not have to be frustrated that the players had different expectations… on paper.

Ask players what they want, ask specific and general questions. Do what works for you.

That GM could have forced their hand, but what was obvious was that when trouble showed, they wanted to run away, not toward.

That was not the type of game I wanted to run.


Game the Game: Roll vs Role: Rock, Paper, Thunder, Death: Thor!

Screenshot 2017-11-06 09.35.15I remember poring through the official writeups for characters with the old Marvel FASERIP system.

Watching Thor: Ragnorak, made me revisit them.

Was Hela stronger than Thor? Sure seemed like that, right?

But that is the mistake?

Apples and Oranges. Rock, Paper, Scissors. Neither is the way fiction works.

Arguing that Hela could not have kicked Thor and Loki’s ass because she wasn’t as strong as them, canonically, is the wrong, wrong way to approach the situation.

Traditional statistic based systems would support the strength vs strength argument.


Trait based systems support a different set of rules.

It doesn’t matter what Thor’s strength is.


Game the Game: Roll vs Role: Superheroes

I love superheroes. rather, I love comicbook superheroes.

So much so I designed a game to play them.

I made some very specific choices.

I played in a game once, we were superheroes, and we were faced with a sentient AI, who we stood no chance of shutting down.

We threw it into the sun.

Not our most shining moment.

But…. I would argue, a necessity, as the system did not allow for another form of resolution.

Many games have rules for subdual damage. But they lack teeth, literally and proverbially in terms of mechanics.

So, if a GM wants players to NOT KILL an NPC, don’t put hurdles in their way.

If your default damage system is killing damage, guess what… you’re playing a game about killing.

Screenshot 2017-10-11 08.52.49.png